[SOLVED] were you considering to implement "Dynamic Range compressor"?

Suggestions, new features, etc.
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: were you considering to implement "Dynamic Range compressor"?

Post by admin » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:29 pm

This is OK as File.flac and file.flac are the same for Windows.

o0O0o
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2018 12:20 pm

Re: were you considering to implement "Dynamic Range compressor"?

Post by o0O0o » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:53 pm

you could calculate suffix based on lowercase filename and attach it to initial filename. in case i described it would help.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: were you considering to implement "Dynamic Range compressor"?

Post by admin » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:25 pm

There's already setting for that - https://imgur.com/oVw3NXA

o0O0o
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2018 12:20 pm

Re: were you considering to implement "Dynamic Range compressor"?

Post by o0O0o » Tue Jun 11, 2019 11:02 pm

yes, i know. but xrecode doesn't add suffix for pair "file" and "File", because names are different. to calculate the necessity to add suffix program should convert filenames to lowercase and if suffix is necessary add it to initial filename.
but such situation could hardly happen in reality, so you could ignore it.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:56 pm

[SOLVED] Re: were you considering to implement "Dynamic Range compressor"?

Post by admin » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:48 pm

Fixed in the latest beta version.

Post Reply